S’pore unis see opportunities in India’s new education policy

S’pore unis see opportunities in India’s new education policy
They see a chance to increase their presence in a lucrative market
By MALMINDERJIT SINGH


INSTEAD of seeing India’s move to allow foreign universities to set up local campuses as a threat, Singapore’s universities and private education institutions are looking at it as an opportunity to expand their presence there.
The Indian Cabinet’s ratification of the Foreign Educational Institutions Bill, partially designed to arrest the outflow of Indian students, has been seen as potentially detrimental to Singapore’s higher education providers who see many Indian students.
They, however, remain optimistic and, in fact, see it as an opportunity to increase their presence in a lucrative market. The number of Indian students in higher education stands at 14 million currently, but sources say that the Indian government has targeted to raise this figure to 21 million by 2012.
The Singapore Management University (SMU), for one, is already looking for partnerships with Indian universities for postgraduate education in areas such as finance, wealth and healthcare management, Rajendra K Srivastava, provost and deputy president (academic affairs) at SMU, told BT.
“On the postgraduate front, India is very much on the radar of SMU for executive education, including specialised master’s programmes and customised training for professionals,” he said.
Others with pre-existing partnerships there may be looking to expand further.
Peter Pang, assistant vice-president, university & global relations at the National University of Singapore (NUS), pointed out that NUS has partnerships with several universities in India, including joint PhD programmes with the Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai, the Indian Institute of Technology Chennai {SEE CORRECTION 1 ABOVE}, and the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, as well as an NUS Overseas College in India.
“The foreign universities bill will open up even more opportunities for collaboration,” he said.
Raffles Education Corporation in Singapore, which already has seven education centres in various Indian cities through joint venture projects with Educomp Solutions, India’s largest education company, may also be on the lookout, although chairman and chief executive officer Chew Hua Seng preferred to comment broadly on this development. “The new law is timely to unleash India’s vast human resource potential to propel it forward economically”, he said. Local players, however, will have their work cut out for them because international players are getting in on the game, too.
New York-based Columbia University will be setting up an international centre for research and regional collaboration in Mumbai later this month, while the Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC), which conducts the Graduate Management Aptitude Test (GMAT), has also announced plans to set up an office in India, its third globally after the United States and the UK.
But still, most remain buoyant about prospects because “the Indian market is big enough to accommodate multiple players”, said a Singapore Institute of Management {SEE CORRECTION 2 ABOVE} (SIM) spokesman.
“(Even though) with market liberalisation Indian students will have more choices, Singapore will still be attractive to international students who want an overseas education in a safe and vibrant multi-cultural environment, as well as one that offers attractive career opportunities in the future.”
The devil is in the details though. The fine print of the bill includes clauses that bar the foreign universities from repatriating profits and put conditions on them to shell out around 500 million rupees (S$15.3 million) upfront and make complete disclosure on their curriculum and faculties, reported India’s Financial Express.
Such clauses may influence Singapore-based institutions to enter the market through joint ventures and partnerships, rather than establishing a direct presence, and to be more cautious about expansion plans. “It is still too early to tell at our current stage of development,” reiterated the SIM spokesman. “We would like to remain focused on our mission, which is to provide good-quality education for adult learners in Singapore.”
But still no one doubts that India’s new bill will up the ante in the education business.
“India’s policy will spur us to be more competitive,” said Lalit Goel, dean of admissions and financial aid at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU). “NTU will continue to put in effort to attract talent . . . We are always looking for bright talent from all countries, including India, and due to the sheer volume of applicants from India, we do not believe that this will affect applications significantly.”
Prof Srivastava echoed the positive sentiments. “SMU has always been a popular destination for Indian students seeking higher education given our close proximity in the heart of Asia and the excellent connections we have with Indian businesses. I believe that going abroad for tertiary studies remains a very attractive option among Indian students for the global exposure and opportunity to know the region better.”
‘Going abroad for tertiary studies remains a very attractive option among Indian students for the global exposure and opportunity to know the region better.’ – Prof Srivastava

CECA review may begin soon

CECA review may begin soon

It will address areas such as mutual recognition agreements
By MALMINDERJIT SINGH
 

[SINGAPORE] The review of Singapore’s Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) with India could be launched as soon next month, said India’s High Commissioner to Singapore, TCA Raghavan, at the sidelines of the Opportunities in Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Sector in India conference yesterday.
Mr Raghavan said that some preliminary work has already been done for a review of the CECA, and it will be formally launched when Minister for Trade Lim Hng Kiang visits India. He added that the review will take into account the changes in the overall trade scenario since the CECA was signed in 2005, which provides traders in Singapore more opportunities as they can now benefit from both the CECA and the Asean-India free trade agreement.
“I think the review will certainly address areas which both sides feel could do with more focus. One area is the MRAs – the Mutual Recognition Agreements. There has been some progress, and some things only mature over time. And the MRAs are a process which depends a lot on the professional organisations on both sides. I think there will be progress in those areas,” elaborated the high commissioner on the possibility of a new and improved CECA.
He also told reporters that the CECA review will be an ongoing dialogue with both countries’ trade ministers making bilateral visits. The review is expected to extend over several months and is expected to be completed substantially by the end of this year.
Singapore is the second largest investor in India, providing 9 per cent of India’s total foreign direct investment (FDI) flows. Mr Raghavan was confident that investment flows between both countries can grow out of the shadows of last year’s dampened global investment climate, and attributed this to India’s macroeconomic stability and a potentially high quality trade in investments agreement between India and Asean, which Singapore investors may find complementary to the CECA.
“One example is the very good turnout we’ve seen in this conference from both India and Singapore. From India, we have about 35 SEZ developers and officials participating, and even more so in terms of the local participation and the queries we have had. The High Commission can provide a platform and our intention is to make the platform as focused as possible, that is to look at the sectors and sub-sectors because the overall argument is now well made and well known – that is, the Indian economy is going to be a growth story over the next decade,” he said.
LB Singhal, director general of India’s Export Promotion Council for Export Oriented Units and SEZs (EPCES), said that there were 575 formal SEZ approvals in India at the end of 2009. Some 105 of these were already functioning and housing as many as 2,761 units, he said. He also pointed out that Singapore companies could play a role in these SEZs as developers or as individual units. In doing so, he highlighted that they stand to benefit through various tax exemptions, duty free goods and 100 per cent FDI through the automatic route, among other features.
Mr Lim said that Singapore companies have gained much experience from planning, developing and implementing SEZs in the region and could apply this expertise to the Indian case, notably in the areas of master planning and industrial development, and in establishing an efficient transport and logistics chain.
Mr Lim noted that although concerns surrounding land acquisition, resettlement and creation of employment need to be addressed and managed effectively, Singapore companies such as Ascendas have done well in India and have a lot to offer to SEZs there.

HSBC's customised trade finance for S'pore firms

HSBC's customised trade finance for S'pore firms
Bank may soon offer option for S'pore-India trade

By MALMINDERJIT SINGH

(SINGAPORE) Singapore companies looking to do business in India may soon look towards customised trade financing options available there, according to Puneet Chaddha, Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC)'s managing director and head of commercial banking, India.

Speaking to The Business Times, he explained that while HSBC's standard products are good to a point, custom-made options are necessary and thus the bank is putting together the proposition of developing country-specific financing products.

Quoting examples of the India-Bangladesh and the India-UAE customised trade financing packages currently available in India, Mr Chaddha added that we are likely to see the same appearing for India-Singapore trade.
Such a development is likely to improve documentation and processes standardisation between banks in Singapore and India. Mr Chaddha said this would allow Singapore companies doing business in India to gain better access to financing than before and they would save through lower financial costs and turnaround time.
The global economic recession has altered the trend of financing choices for businesses in India. According to Mr Chaddha, the involvement of banks was kept low in the pre-crisis environment as buyers and sellers trusted each other more with credit options. However, as commercial trust becomes more fragile with the onslaught of the recession, more companies have turned to banks and their instruments, such as letters of credit, as credit enhancers.

Currently, Mr Chaddha explained, both small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large multinational corporations (MNCs) can draw from a host of financing structures and trade products that the banks in India provide. He pointed out that MNCs may also raise financing domestically or off-shore, depending on which is the cheaper market to borrow from.

Singapore is India's 14th largest import market and fourth largest export destination, as well as being the second largest provider of foreign direct investment into India. While Singapore's exports to India have largely been concentrated in mineral oils, electrical and medical equipment and organic chemicals, recent announcements by the Indian government to liberalise certain sectors of the economy, particularly financial services, higher education and defence, could signal more opportunities for businesses in Singapore.
'I see a greater sense of comfort among Singapore companies in doing business in India now,' Mr Chaddha said. 'As a result of the recent announcements by the Indian Finance Minister (on offering more banking licences), we will see more Singapore companies setting up operations in India, and particularly in the financial services industry,' he added.

HSBC, according to Mr Chaddha, will be following this segment of leading international business very closely as it looks to focus on facilitating cross-border trade. As such, he said the bank is clear that it will look towards penetrating the market that the India-Singapore trade flows creates.

At the same time, he explains that HSBC will create a proposition that it would like to bring to its customers in this segment, so as to highlight the benefits they may enjoy in doing business with the bank. This, he says, represents a more scientific approach to bilateral trade that HSBC is looking to adopt as opposed to simply targeting a certain percentage share of the market and he is confident that this will be a successful strategy.

Mr Chaddha was in Singapore to speak at a session of the International Enterprise Singapore's advisory seminar series on 'Doing Business in India' yesterday.

Challenges Facing Singapore's Economy (Part 1) - Shifts in the Global Economy

Global economic shifts, highlighted by the current economic crisis, have seen a severe fall in demand from the Western hemisphere with Asia playing a more central role. As the US and European countries recover, with their demand for Asian exports taking a much longer time than expected to return to normalcy, export-oriented Singapore will have to look at newer markets to correct its falling trade balances and fuel aggregate demand. Here, newer markets in Asia, Latin America and Middle East will have to be developed through a more creative trade policy. Bilateral and multilateral engagements within the region, such as ASEAN, may allow Singapore to develop the hinterland as its market so as to supplement a small domestic economy.

The rise of China and India provide economic potential for Singapore exports and businesses as they are large markets that may help compensate the drop in demand in the US. While they provide opportunities, the ascendancy of these countries, particularly China, may also compete with Singapore for resources and investments for similar industries. Given that China primarily engages in more labour-intensive lower-end manufacturing activities, nevertheless a large domestic market and cheaper labour provides China with a comparative advantage that Singapore may find difficult to compete with over time. Moreover, the rising costs of fuel have made transport costs no longer negligible and may reverse the trend of transnational production networks. If production networks become more vertically integrated, then China may be well-placed to capture more stages of the production process, creating adverse impact for other manufacturing-intensive countries in the region.

Given that Singapore could concede this competition and continue to move up the value-chain of economic activities, this in itself has implications for the economy. Singapore has been quick to move up the value-chain and phase out industries that are lower in the rung. While this is strategic in utilizing the comparative advantage we have in technology, knowledge and capital, it has led to rising costs of doing business here, which has disadvantaged our Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs).